THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HIROMI USUI, YUTAKA MASUDA
and NOBUYOSHI HANDA
__________
Appeal No. 1996-3995
Application 08/283,7211
___________
HEARD: February 2, 2000
___________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4 and 7 through 9,
which are the only claims remaining in this application.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
method for manufacturing a fabric for ink jet printing which
comprises applying an aqueous dispersion or emulsion having
1Application for patent filed August 1, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007