THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 32 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WOO-BAEG-CHOI, GUY R. HUMPHREY, PAUL J. REIDER, ICHIRO SHINKAI, ANDREW S. THOMPSON and RALPH P. VOLANTE ____________ Appeal No. 1996-4090 Application No. 08/241,958 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 5, 9, 11, 12, 16 and 17 which are all the claims remaining in the application.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007