Ex parte BAILEY, II - Page 1




                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                         
                                written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                                                                                          Paper No. 22                     

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                      __________                                                           
                                              Ex parte JOHN D. BAILEY, II                                                  
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                 Appeal No. 1996-4109                                                      
                                                 Application 08/123,557                                                    
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
                  Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
                  ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         

                         This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner’s                        
                  final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-15 and 18-20, which are all the claims pending in the                   
                  application.                                                                                             








                                                            1                                                              



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007