Ex parte TANIGUCHI et al. - Page 6


                 Appeal No. 1996-4119                                                                                  
                 Application No. 08/261,406                                                                            

                 Claim 1:                                                                                              
                        The examiner states (Answer, bridging paragraph, pages 5-6):                                   
                        It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art at the                        
                        time [a]ppellants’ invention was made to determine all operable and                            
                        optimal parameters the purification of alpha-1-antitrypsin by Bollens’                         
                        procedure as modified by Ng and Harris, such as the volume the                                 
                        impure protein is suspended in, in what the protein is suspended, and                          
                        the concentration of the PEG/ZnCl2 precipitant because it is desirable                         
                        to choose buffer conditions and to have the components of a                                    
                        precipitation present in ratios that insure the highest yield and purity of                    
                        the protein that is being purified.  Further, it would have been obvious                       
                        to one with ordinary skill in the art at the time [a]ppellants’ invention                      
                        was made to insert an additional anion-exchange chromatography                                 
                        step after the first anion-exchange step in the purification process of                        
                        alpha-1-antitrypsin by the protocol of Bollen as modified by Ng and                            
                        Harris, because it is desirable in the art to purify a therapeutic product                     
                        to the greatest extent possible in order to produce a product having                           
                        few impurities, and having homogeneous properties, and additional                              
                        purification steps would accomplish this.                                                      
                        As noted by the examiner (Answer, page 4) Bollen discloses all the process                     
                 steps of appellants’ claim 1, except the use of ZnCl2 in the PEG precipitation step                   
                 and a separate ZnCl2 precipitation step. Bollen discloses (column 4, lines 3-21) the                  
                 use of a Tris-HCl buffer and a phosphate buffer, both of which comprise water.                        
                 Therefore, Bollen does disclose “suspending the impure protein fraction comprising                    
                 I1-proteinase inhibitor in water,” as recited in appellants’ claim 1.  Bollen also                    

                 discloses the use of ammonium sulfate precipitation (column 2, line 42, to column 3,                  
                 line 4).                                                                                              
                        Appellants state (Brief, page 8) that “claim 1 requires the precipitation of                   
                 unwanted proteins by the addition of PEG and ZnCl2, leaving alpha-1-proteinase                        




                                                          6                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007