Ex parte GIBLER et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-0005                                                        
          Application 08/340,966                                                      



          tion of water from the hydrogenated polymer solution or sus-                
          pension (referred to as a “polymer cement”) is necessary for                
          the effective removal of metals (catalytic metal residues)                  
          because such metals are often concentrated in a small amount                
          of water entrained within the polymer cement.  See the speci-               
          fication at page 2, lines 15-22.                                            
          Appellants’ method requires exposing a polymer solution or                  
          suspension containing a known hydrogenation catalyst, i.e., a               
          Group VIII metal alkoxide or carboxylate and metal alkyl such               




          as the reaction product of nickel 2-ethyl-hexanoate with                    
          triethylaluminum, to a partial pressure of hydrogen for a time              
          sufficient to hydrogenate greater than about 90 percent of the              
          ethylenic unsaturation.  Thereafter, additional hydrogenation               
          catalyst is added to the “greater than 90 percent” hydroge-                 
          nated polymer solution or suspension in an amount “effective                
          to improve separation of hydrogenation catalyst metal from the              
          polymer solution” (claim 1, lines 13-15), and the resulting                 
          hydrogenated polymer solution is mixed with an aqueous acid                 

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007