THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte GERALD R. DEVER, THOMAS J. LAUGHLIN and WILLIAM S. ROGERS _____________ Appeal No. 1997-0011 Application No. 08/162,508 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9. Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below: 1. A deodorizer comprising: a) a patch containing fragrance; 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007