THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WAYNE M. DORAN, JOHN E. BRAY, CHARLES K. POPE and
JOHN O. G. VIETH
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0014
Application No. 08/192,937
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 3
through 5, 7, 8, 25 through 29, 42, 44, 46 and 61. In a first
Amendment After Final (paper number 17), claim 44 was amended,
and claims 4 and 61 were canceled. In a second Amendment
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007