The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KASPAR KUSTER and ANTON RUEGGE
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0091
Application No. 08/115,530
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 4, 5, 9 and 14-17. Claims 6, 7 and 1
10-13 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed
claim. Claims 1, 3 and 8 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
1Claim 17 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007