Ex parte KUSTER et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1997-0091                                                                                     Page 3                        
                 Application No. 08/115,530                                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellants' invention relates to an apparatus for                                                                         
                 coating board-shaped articles, especially printed circuit                                                                              
                 boards  (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under                                                                             
                 appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                          


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Bosher                                       4,324,052                                             Apr. 13,                            
                 1982                                                                                                                                   
                 Bossard et al.                                        4,559,896                                             Dec.                       
                 24, 1985                                                                                                                               
                 (Bossard)                                                                                                                              
                 Wenger et al.                                4,926,789                                             May  22,                            
                 1990                                                                                                                                   
                 (Wenger)                                                                                                                               
                 Kuster     2                        EP 0 541 879 A1                                       May  19, 1993                                




                          Claims 2, 4, 5, 9 and 14-17 stand rejected under 35                                                                           
                 U.S.C.                                                                                                                                 



                          2In determining the teachings of Kuster, we will rely on                                                                      
                 the translation provided by the PTO.  A copy of the                                                                                    
                 translation is attached for the appellants' convenience.                                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007