THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JAMES W. THACKERAY and GEORGE W. ORSULA __________ Appeal No. 1997-0106 Application 07/792,482 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before DOWNEY, HANLON, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 36-39, 44-47, 49-58, 60, 61, 63, 66-68 and 70, all the claims pending in the application. The claims on appeal are directed to a method for treating a substrate, such as a microelectronic wafer or a liquid crystal display substrate. Claim 36 is illustrative and reads as follows: 36. A method for treating a substrate comprising: 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007