THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GANESH S. GANESAN,
MICHAEL A. HELSER
MYRON M. UECKER
and TODD W. GUSEK
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0164
Application 08/349,300
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before OWENS, WALTZ and JEFFREY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 9, 11 through 15,
and 22 through 29 as amended subsequent to the final rejection
(see the amendment dated Mar. 7, 1996, Paper No. 9, entered as
per the Advisory Action dated Mar. 19, 1996, Paper No. 10).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007