. THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GEORGE V. DARAVINGAS, TIMOTHY C. HEITKE and DEAN F. FUNK
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0219
Application No. 08/254,457
______________
HEARD: February 24, 2000
_______________
Before WINTERS, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1 through 6, 8
through 15, 17 through 26, 28 and 29, which are the only claims remaining in the
application.
A copy of claims 1 and 22 , which are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, is
appended to this decision.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007