Ex parte MANCUSI et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 31         
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
              Ex parte MICHAEL D. MANCUSI, JOSEPH E. MASSERY, ROGER F.                
                          OSMOND and MICHAEL J. FITZGERALD                            
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-0265                                  
                             Application No. 08/294,882                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LEVY, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
              This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, 7-14 and 16.                   
          Claims 6 and 15 have been indicated to contain allowable                    
          subject matter.  An amendment after final rejection was filed               
          on April 24, 1996 and was entered by the examiner.                          
          The disclosed invention pertains to a wiring hub for                        
          interconnecting a plurality of network devices to form a local              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007