The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHAEL D. MANCUSI, JOSEPH E. MASSERY, ROGER F. OSMOND and MICHAEL J. FITZGERALD ____________ Appeal No. 1997-0265 Application No. 08/294,882 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, 7-14 and 16. Claims 6 and 15 have been indicated to contain allowable subject matter. An amendment after final rejection was filed on April 24, 1996 and was entered by the examiner. The disclosed invention pertains to a wiring hub for interconnecting a plurality of network devices to form a localPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007