Appeal No. 1997-0265
Application No. 08/294,882
1. Claims 1, 11-14 and 16 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Peterson and
Franaszek.
2. Claims 2-4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Peterson, Franaszek
and Moran.
3. Claims 5 and 7-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Peterson,
Franaszek, Moran and Blount.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the main brief and the answer
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken
into consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’
arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner’s
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007