THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RICHARD A. ERHART and RICHARD B. NELSON __________ Appeal No. 1997-0321 Application 08/052,494 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. LALL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 10 to 15. 1 1 An amendment after final was filed [paper no. 6] and its entry was approved by the Examiner [paper no. 8]. The amendment, however, made no changes to the claims. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007