Appeal No. 1997-0321
Application 08/052,494
“the specification are [sic, is] inadequate, unclear and
confusing and because the description in the specification
originally [filed] has never made clear as to what [is] to be
included in the ‘means for detecting integrity of bonding’ nor
does it make clear ... what are meant to be included in these
as well.”
Appellants argue [brief, pages 3 to 6] that the terms and
the recitations used in the claims are well described in the
specification and point to various parts of the specification
and the drawings to support their arguments.
We have reviewed the specification for the references
made by Appellants in their arguments. We are of the view
that the specification does provide an adequate description
for the invention. The specification shows the various means
involved in testing the integrity of bonding between the
output of the display driver and the display. Figures 1 and 2
of the specification, together with the associated text, show
how the circuit in figure 1 is initialized for the testing
mode, how a sampling time interval is chosen, how a test
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007