Ex parte NOZUYAMA - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 34              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       

                             Ex parte YASUYUKI NOZUYAMA                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-0342                                  
                                Application 08/229,135                                
                                     ___________                                      
                                HEARD: April 20, 2000                                 
                                     ___________                                      

          Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 10 through 16.  Claims 1 through 9 were canceled                     
          earlier in the prosecution.  An amendment after final                       

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007