THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROHIT AGARWAL
__________
Appeal No. 1997-0401
Application 08/305,262
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiners’
final rejection of claims 1 to 20, which constitute all of the
pending claims in the application before us on appeal.
BACKGROUND
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a method for
dithering during a color conversion process in a digital video
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007