THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VICTOR J. KETCHAM, ENZO L. COLTRINARI
and WAYNE W. HAZEN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0448
Application No. 08/327,980
____________
HEARD: December 8, 1999
____________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner finally rejecting claims 2
through 7, 11 through 15, 17, 19 and 21 and refusing to allow claims 1, 10, 16, 18 and 20 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 1, 2, 181
and 20 are illustrative:
1The amendment filed August 9, 1995 (Paper No. 9), cancelling claims 8 and 9 and amending claims 1, 10, 16,
18 and 20, was entered by the examiner in the advisory action mailed August 22, 1995 (Paper No. 10).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007