Appeal No. 1997-0467 Application 08/318,019 examiner has not established a prima facie case of non-enablement with adequate reasons or evidence. Accordingly, the rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is reversed. In conclusion, we do not sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 15, 16, and 18 through 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Nor do we sustain the rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. The examiner's decision rejecting claims 15 through 22 is reversed. REVERSED ) SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) TONI R. SCHEINER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) SDW/cam 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007