Appeal No. 1997-0483 Application No. 07/648,900 sustained her burden of establishing a prima facie case of nonenablement, we do not reach appellants' rebuttal evidence discussed on pages 16-18 of the brief. . CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 5, 6, 13, 16 and 19-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs, as indefinite and non-enabled is reversed. REVERSED DOUGLAS W. ROBINSON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) TONI R. SCHEINER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 11 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007