Appeal No. 1997-0538
Application No. 08/262,168
(2) The rejection of claims 8, 13 and 19 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(a) as anticipated by the disclosure of Kim is affirmed;
(3) The rejection of claims 8, 13 and 19 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as anticipated by the disclosure of Larsen is
affirmed;
(4) The rejection of claims 1 through 4, 7, 8, 13 and 19
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the disclosure of
Kim is affirmed;
(5) The rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 12 and 14
through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the
disclosure of Larsen is reversed; and
(6) The rejection of claims 8, 13 and 19 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as unpatentable over the disclosure of Larsen is
affirmed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
19
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007