Appeal No. 1997-0601
Application 08/161,878
conventional package with a heat sink and encapsulant and
leads extending therefrom, as illustrated by Schovanec for
thyristor devices.” Appellants have not argued these claims
separately, having elected to group them with claim 1 above.
Therefore, we sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 12
to 14 over Ohta and Schovanec.
In summary, we have sustained the rejections of claims 1
to 6 and 12 to 16. Accordingly, we affirm.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
-13-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007