Ex parte SHARMA - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today               
             (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                 
                      (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                                                            Paper No. 27              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte  DUSHYANT SHARMA                               
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-0629                                  
                             Application No. 08/085,505                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF1                                       
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and BARRY,  Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection              
          of claims 2-8, all of the claims pending in the present                     
          application.  Claims 1 and 9 have been canceled.  An amendment              


               1Appellant’s attendance at the oral hearing set for March 6, 2000, was 
          waived in the communication received on March 3, 2000.                      
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007