Ex parte SHARMA - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1997-0629                                                        
          Application No. 08/085,505                                                  


          only when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or              
          under the principles of inherency, each and every element of a              
          claimed invention as well as disclosing structure which is                  
          capable of performing the recited functional limitations.  RCA              
          Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444,              
          221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228               
          (1984); W.L.                                                                





          Gore and Assoc, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554,                 
          220                                                                         
          USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851                  
          (1984).                                                                     
               With respect to independent claim 2, the Examiner has                  
          indicated (Answer, pages 3 and 4) how the various limitations               
          are read on the disclosure of Britton.  In response,                        
          Appellant’s arguments center on the alleged deficiency of                   
          Britton in disclosing the requirements of subparagraph c) of                
          appealed                                                                    
          claim 2.  We note that the relevant portion of claim 2                      
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007