Appeal No. 1997-0629 Application No. 08/085,505 only when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or under the principles of inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention as well as disclosing structure which is capable of performing the recited functional limitations. RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L. Gore and Assoc, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984). With respect to independent claim 2, the Examiner has indicated (Answer, pages 3 and 4) how the various limitations are read on the disclosure of Britton. In response, Appellant’s arguments center on the alleged deficiency of Britton in disclosing the requirements of subparagraph c) of appealed claim 2. We note that the relevant portion of claim 2 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007