Ex parte KARNER et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-0664                                                        
          Application No. 08/280,945                                                  


          use of the recited “at least one compound which contains                    
          nitrogen” (appealed claims 1, 14, and 25) (answer, page 4).                 
               To remedy this deficiency in Holley, the examiner relies               
          upon the teachings of Burton and Jackson.  According to the                 
          examiner, Burton teaches that NO  pollutants are formed during              
                                          x                                           
          the high temperature combustion of carbonaceous fuel, that                  
          such pollutants are undesirable, and that the pollutants can                
          be reduced by spraying a solution of urea and water to the                  
          effluent of the combustion gas (answer, pages 4-5).  The                    
          examiner also relies upon Jackson for the teaching that the                 
          pickling bath may contain nitric acid and, in addition, urea,               
          which is described in the reference as inhibiting the                       
          accumulation of nitrous acid and NO  (answer, page 5).                      
                                             x                                        
          Further, the examiner adds that “Jackson et al fairly suggest               
          the feasibility of having a mixture of urea/acid solution and               
          the urea is still capable of removing the NO  compounds”                    
                                                      x                               
          (answer, page 6) but explains that “Jackson et al is only                   
          applied to teach that the presence of urea in a pickling bath               
          would not have any negative effect on the pickling process and              
          in [the] pickling art, the artisan recognizes that NO  is                   
                                                               x                      
          [are] undesirable by-products” (answer, page 13).                           
               Based on these prior art teachings, the examiner                       
          concludes that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary                

                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007