Ex parte BARANOV et al. - Page 1

                          THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                        
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                
            publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                                                                             Paper No. 31                     

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                      Ex parte VLADIMIR I. BARANOV,                                           
                                           LJUBOV A. RYABOVA,                                                 
                                           OLEG B. YARCHUK and                                                
                                            ALEXANDR S. SPIRIN                                                
                                            Appeal No. 1997-0878                                              
                                            Application 07/834,523                                            
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
            Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ROBINSON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                      
            WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of claims                  
            22 through 34.   Subsequent thereto, claims 28 through 30 were canceled.  This leaves             
            claims 22 through 27 and 31 through 34 for our consideration.                                     


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007