THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte OSAMU NAKAJIMA
and KUDO SAITAMA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1064
Application 08/391,0961
______________
HEARD: MARCH 7, 2000
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1 and 2.
1Application for patent filed February 21, 1995.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/091,019 filed July 14, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007