THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte POUL-EGEDE GLAHN
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1068
Application 08/161,635
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 86-92 and 101-112.
Appealed claim 86 is representative and is reproduced
below:
86. A process comprising treating a solution, gel or
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007