Ex parte DAMSON et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law             
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                              

                                                                                                      Paper No. 18                 

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        

                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              

                 Ex parte ECKHART DAMSON, HELMUT DENZ, MARTIN KLENK, WERNER HERDEN,                                                
                                       WINFRIED MOSER and MATTHIAS KUESELL                                                         

                                                     Appeal No. 1997-1075                                                          
                                                   Application No. 08/335,084                                                      

                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                

               Before KRASS, DIXON and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  

               BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner’s final rejection of                   

               Claims 1, 3-15, and 17, all the claims remaining in the application.                                                

                       We reverse.                                                                                                 

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007