Ex parte HOCK et al. - Page 1




                                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                 

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal              
                                                  and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                                                                 Paper No. 28                   
                                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                                ____________                                                                    
                                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                                ____________                                                                    
                                         Ex parte JOHANN HOCK and HERMANN KARGES                                                                
                                                                ____________                                                                    
                                                           Appeal No. 1997-1093                                                                 
                                                        Application No. 08/272,2811                                                             
                                                                ____________                                                                    
                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                     
                                                                ____________                                                                    
                Before WINTERS, SPIEGEL, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           




                                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner finally                                           
                rejecting claims 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 10 through 14, and refusing to allow claims 1 and 9 as                                       






                         1Application for patent filed July 8, 1994.  According to appellants, this application is a                            
                continuation of application 08/003,318 filed January 12, 1993, now abandoned.                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007