THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHANN HOCK and HERMANN KARGES
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1093
Application No. 08/272,2811
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, SPIEGEL, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner finally
rejecting claims 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 10 through 14, and refusing to allow claims 1 and 9 as
1Application for patent filed July 8, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of application 08/003,318 filed January 12, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007