THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT B. LACOUNT
____________
Appeal No. 97-1107
Application No. 08/047,512
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
10, 15-21, 23, and 25-27. Claims 11-14, 22, 24, 29, and 30 have been allowed by the examiner.
Claim 28 has been objected to as being dependent upon rejected claim 27, but the examiner has not
rejected this claim over the prior art.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007