THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KENNETH P. WEISS ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1117 Application No. 08/300,7031 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9, 12, 15-33, and 35-37, all of the claims pending in the present application. Claims 10, 11, 13, 14, and 34 have been canceled. 1Application for patent filed September 02, 1994. According to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application No. 07/911,208, filed July 9, 1992, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007