Appeal No. 1997-1117
Application No. 08/300,703
unpatentable over the combination of Weiss, Harder, Elliot,
Fumanelli, and Warren and further in view of Mauer.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief and Answer for the 2
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the Examiner as support
for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken
into consideration, in reaching our decision, Appellant’s
arguments set forth in the Brief along with the Examiner’s
2The original non-compliant Appeal Brief was filed July
17, 1996 and was corrected by a Supplemental Appeal Brief
filed May 11, 1999. We will refer to the original Appeal
Brief as simply the Brief.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007