Ex Parte CHARNESKI - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1997-1131                                                        
          Application No. 08/395,119                                                  

          of first and second boxes and are arranged in juxtaposed rows.              
          The first and second boxes share border defining elements and               
          various display elements of the boxes are illuminated to jointly            
          define the displayed symbols.                                               
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
          1.   A display device for a selected symbol formed with a first             
          box having border defining elements, and with a second box having           
          border defining elements, various ones of the elements of each of           
          the two boxes being illumined or darkened to define jointly the             
          symbol.                                                                     
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Bailey et al. (Bailey)        4,039,890           Aug. 02, 1977             
               Claims 1 through 18 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Bailey.  Claims 19 and 20 stand            
          finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over           
          Bailey.                                                                     
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the               
          Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs1 and Answer for the               
          respective details.                                                         


               1 The Appeal Brief was filed September 19, 1996.  In                   
          response to the Examiner’s Answer dated January 21, 1997, a Reply           
          Brief was filed March 18, 1997 which was acknowledged and entered           
          by the Examiner without further comment on April 15, 1997.                  
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007