Paper No. 22 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte JOHN L. FREEOUF ______________ Appeal No. 1997-1249 Application 08/179,601 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges. HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 2 through 4, 11 through 14, 16 through 20 and 22 through 27, Paper No. 10, mailed November 22, 1995 (claims 1, 5 through 10 and 15 had been canceled). Although claim 21 had been rejected in a previous rejection (Paper No. 8), no 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007