Ex parte FREEOUF - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 22                   
               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte JOHN L. FREEOUF                                
                                   ______________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-1249                                  
                              Application 08/179,601                                  
                                   _______________                                    
                             ON BRIEF                                                
                                   _______________                                    
          Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO and HECKER, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 2 through 4, 11 through 14, 16 through 20 and 22                     
          through 27, Paper No. 10, mailed November 22, 1995 (claims 1,               
          5 through 10 and 15 had been canceled).  Although claim 21 had              
          been rejected in a previous rejection (Paper No. 8), no                     


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007