Ex parte DAVIS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-1264                                                        
          Application 07/882,560                                                      

          a data processing system.  More particularly, the invention                 
          relates to a procedure for initialization of a central                      
          processing unit (CPU) regardless of whether the CPU is                      
          operating in a fault-free mode or in a fault mode.                          
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A data processing system, comprising:                              
               a central processing unit (CPU), said CPU having a first               
          possible operating state of fault-free operation and a second               
          possible operating state of fault operation;                                
               first means for applying a first signal to said CPU to                 
          provide notice of initialization, said CPU operative to                     
          complete certain processing tasks in response to said first                 
          signal; and                                                                 
               second means for applying a second signal to said CPU                  
          subsequent to said first signal and upon expiration of a                    
          predetermined time interval to cause the initialization of                  
          said CPU regardless of whether the CPU is operating in said                 
          first possible operating state or said second possible                      
          operating state.                                                            
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Guziak et al. (Guziak)        4,726,024          Feb. 16, 1988              
          Claims 1-16, 18-31, 33-67, 69 and 70 stand rejected                         
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the                        
          disclosure of Guziak.                                                       





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007