THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte UNA M. QUINLAN __________ Appeal No. 1997-1271 Application 08/294,765 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before THOMAS, HECKER, DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6, 10, 13 through 21, 23, 27, 30 and 31. Representative claim 1 is reproduced below: 1. A computer system, which comprises: a first device receiving input data and generating requests, for information relating to the input data, each of a plurality of said requests includes request data and request ownership information; 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007