Appeal no. 97-1293 Application no. 08/281,812 convenience is simply inconsistent with section 103, which, according to Graham [v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966)] and its progeny, entitles an applicant to issuance of an otherwise proper patent unless the PTO establishes that the invention as claimed in the application is obvious over cited prior art, based on the specific comparison of that prior art with claim limitations. We once again hold today that our precedents do not establish any per se rules of obviousness, just as those precedents themselves expressly declined to create such rules. Any conflicts as may be perceived to exist derive from an impermissible effort to extract per se rules from decisions that disavow precisely such extraction. To paraphrase the court in Ochiai, at 71 F.3d at 1570, 37 USPQ2d at 1132, "there are not [Aller] obviousness rejections . . . but rather only section 103 obviousness rejections." The facts in the record must support the legal conclusion of obviousness. As set forth in In re Cofer, 354 F.2d 664, 667, 148 USPQ 268, 271 (CCPA 1966): Necessarily, it is facts appearing in the record, rather than prior decisions in and of themselves, which must support the legal conclusion of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103. Merely stating that a compound or composition is obvious, without adequate factual support, is not sufficient. Hence, a simple statement that it would have been obvious to optimize the method conditions and properties of the final product is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. See In re Antonie, 559 F.2d 618, 620, 195 USPQ 6, 8 (CCPA 1977). While Aller contains language about optimizing ranges the prior art reference in that case was an article describing one experiment, apparently without disclosing any ranges. See In re Aller, supra, 220 F.2d at 456, 105 USPQ at 235. Here, by contrast, both Lukacs and Yajima disclose several examples with sintering temperatures, and further, Yajima teaches a range of sintering temperatures up to 2000EC. Yajima expressly teaches a range of temperatures and the examiner has provided no evidence for optimizing the 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007