Ex parte ADAMSKI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-1314                                                        
          Application No. 08/300,684                                                  





                    This is a decision on appeal from the final rejec-                
          tion of claims 1, 3 through 7, and 9 through 12, all of the                 
          claims pending in this application.1                                        
                    The invention relates to a cathode ray tube (CRT)                 
          for color television, and more particularly to the bimetal                  
          springs which support the aperture mask-frame assembly in the               
          face panel portion of the glass envelope of the CRT.                        
                    Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as               
          follows:                                                                    
                    1. A support spring for an aperture mask-frame                    
          assembly in a cathode ray tube, the spring being an elongate                
          member of flat spring material comprising a base portion, a                 
          body portion and an apertured portion, the base portion lying               
          in a first plane and the body and apertured portions lying in               
          a second plane, the first and second planes intersecting to                 
          form an angle, characterized in that two raised spaced apart                
          ribs of spring material extend longitudinally along at least a              
          portion of the body portion of the spring.                                  
                                                                                     
                    The references relied on by the Examiner are as                   
          follows:                                                                    
          Fukuzawa et al. (Fukuzawa)         4,335,329           Jun. 15,             
          1982                                                                        


               We note  the Examiner correctly indicates that claims 9-11 depend from claim 7, not claim 8.1                                                                     
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007