THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HUGH P. McADAMS and CHING-YUH TSAY __________ Appeal No. 1997-1364 Application 08/343,276 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 5, 6, 14, and 15, which constitute all the claims on appeal. Representative claim 5 is reproduced below: 5. A substrate bias pumping arrangement comprising: first and second charge pump circuits connected in separate circuit paths between an input terminal and a substrate, the first and second charge pump circuits operating alternatively supplying charge to the substrate in response to 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007