Ex parte MCADAMS et al. - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1997-1364                                                        
          Application 08/343,276                                                      


          alternative levels of an input signal applied to the input                  
          terminal, each of the charge pump circuits including:                       
               a pumping capacitor;                                                   
               a p-channel pumping transistor having a control electrode              
          and having a conduction path connected in a series circuit                  
          path with the pumping capacitor between the input terminal and              
          the substrate; and                                                          
               a bootstrap circuit connected between the input terminal               
          and the control electrode for enabling the p-channel pumping                
          transistor to conduct charge from the pumping capacitor to the              
          substrate without imparting all of a threshold voltage of the               
          p-channel pumping transistor as a voltage loss.                             

               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
          Truong                   4,733,108                Mar. 22, 1988             
          Furuyama                 5,343,087                Aug. 30, 1994             
                                   (filing date June 10, 1991)                        
               Claims 5, 6, 14, and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon                
          Truong alone as to claims 14 and 15, with the addition of                   
          Furuyama as to claims 5 and 6.1                                             
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and                 
          the examiner, reference is made to the brief and the answer                 
          for the respective details thereof.                                         
                                       OPINION                                        



               A separate rejection of claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over a patent to Douglas was1                                                                     
          withdrawn at page 2 of the answer.                                          
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007