Appeal No. 1997-1378
Application No. 08/065,328
RRather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the 1
respective details.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the Examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the Examiner as support
for the rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration in reaching our decision, Appellants’ arguments
set forth in the Briefs along with the Examiner’s rationale in
support of the rejection and arguments in rebuttal set forth
in the Examiner’s Answers.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that the evidence relied upon and the level of skill in
1The original Appeal Brief was filed June 5, 1995. In
response to the Examiner’s Answer dated September 5, 1995, a
Reply Brief was filed October 11, 1995. The Examiner entered
the Reply Brief and submitted a Supplemental Examiner’s Answer
entitled “Response to Reply Brief” on February 4, 1997.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007