THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte IVAN BOZOVIC and JAMES N. ECKSTEIN ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1454 Application No. 07/931,632 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CAROFF, OWENS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of claims 1-2 and 5-8. According to the record, it appears that claims 9-14 also remain pending in appellants' application, statements in the Brief to the contrary notwithstanding. However, claims 9-14 stand withdrawn from considerationPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007