Ex parte BOZOVIC et al. - Page 1




                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                     

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
          for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.

                                                               Paper No. 33           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                     Ex parte IVAN BOZOVIC and JAMES N. ECKSTEIN                      
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-1454                                  
                             Application No. 07/931,632                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before CAROFF, OWENS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of              
          claims 1-2 and 5-8.  According to the record, it appears that               
          claims 9-14 also remain pending in appellants' application,                 
          statements in the Brief to the contrary notwithstanding.                    
          However, claims 9-14 stand withdrawn from consideration                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007