Ex parte BOZOVIC et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-1454                                                        
          Application No. 07/931,632                                                  


          x>y, said compound being characterized by zero resistivity at               
          a temperature of at least 35 K.                                             
               The examiner relies upon the following references of                   
          record as prior art in rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102               
          and                                                                         
          35 U.S.C. § 103:                                                            
          Koinuma et al. (Koinuma), "Fabrication by Laser MBE and In                  
          Situ Characterization of Layered Cuprates", Advances in                     
          Superconductivity III (Nov. 6-9, 1990), pp. 1135-38.                        
          Takano et al. (Takano), "Superconductivity in the Ba-Sr-Cu-O                
          system", Physica C 176 (1991), pp. 441-444.                                 
          Komuro et al. (Komuro)  4,983,575       Jan. 8, 1991.                       
               The following rejections are maintained by the examiner:               
               1.  Claims 1-2 and 5-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
          112, first paragraph, for lack of enablement and an adequate                
          written description of "metal-atom vacancy" and "vacancies".                
               2.  Claims 1-2 and 5-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
          112, second paragraph, as being indefinite with regard to the               
          expression "substantially more vacancies".                                  
               3.  Claims 1-2 and 5-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Koinuma.                                   
               4.  Claims 1, 2 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Takano.                                    
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007