Ex parte HOFFMAN - Page 15




          Appeal No. 1997-1505                                      Page 15           
          Application No. 08/580,778                                                  




          We find that Grandfield discloses (col. 1 lines 56-66) that                 
               A phase lock loop is provided which is responsive                      
               to the reference frequency signal and to an operating                  
                    frequency signal to provide a current reference                   
          signal                                                                      
               at the output of the loop.  The current reference signal               
               is provided to a current to frequency converter which                  
                    generates the operating frequency signal. A current               
               mirror, also coupled to the phase lock loop output                     
               provides an output current essentially equal to the                    
               current reference signal which is suitable for                         
               providing the injector current for I L devices.2                                  
          It is clear from the above that Grandfield is directed to a                 
          current reference device and does not disclose or suggest a                 
          reference voltage generator.  In our view, Grandfield                       
          therefore would not have suggested to one of ordinary skill in              
          the art to have provided the current averaging data separator               
          of Wahler with a reference voltage generator including                      
          adjustment of the loop frequency until a desired reference                  
          voltage is generated.                                                       
               The examiner asserts (answer, page 5) that Wahler                      
          discloses “means for locking (means, not shown, providing                   
          ÷N).” (answer, page 9) and that the “fixed signal ÷N provided               
          to divider 16" of Wahler “can reasonably be considered                      
          ‘locking’ such as recited in the present claims.”  We find                  







Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007