THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KAZUYA OGINO, NARUTOSHI HAYASHI,
SETSUKO YAMAMOTO and TAKASHI OMURA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1513
Application No. 08/249,736
______________
HEARD: June 7, 2000
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 2 through 11 and 13.
Claim 13 is representative and is reproduced below:
13. A dye containing polarizing film which
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007