THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ELFRIEDE SEXTL, ECKEHART ROLAND, PETER KLEINSCHMIT and AKOS KISS ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1549 Application No. 08/208,143 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, KRATZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4-21, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. INVENTION Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a method for removing organic material from exhaust air and/orPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007