THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CRAIG W. ADAMS
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1668
Application No. 08/361,0241
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SPIEGEL, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-7, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Claims 1 and 5 are illustrative and read as follows.
1Application for patent filed December 21, 1994. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of application no. 07/925,059 filed August 4, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007