The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte GURPREET S. AHLUWALIA and DOUGLAS SHANDER __________ Appeal No. 1997-1717 Application No. 08/068,256 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges. WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 8 through 12. Claim 2 stands objected to and “would be allowable if rewritten in independent form” (final rejection, Paper No. 13, page 2). Claims 3 through 7, the only other claims pending in the application, have been withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not readable on the elected claims. Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007